Jank implicated in play for pay?

ISU's Tim Janklovich continues to be in the news as part of and tied into this investment scam/scandal that was run by Houston AAU kingpin David Salinas.
Jank is described as a very good friend of Salinas' and did, indeed, land a very key players who was an AAU player for Salinas.......maybe implicated in a pay for play payoff getting a Houston Select player for his money??

http://bradleyfans.com/vb/showthread.php?p=233808#post233808

BUT here are some of the amazing facts about this guy Salinas...

- he was not a registered investment adviser or representative - so why would anyone give their money to him most of all give the guy MILLIONS!

- The guy flunked out of college -- he had no degree - he left school "under academic suspension"!

- He bilked more than $55 million from people (coaches and non-coaches) just in this one scam alone! How can people be so incredibly stupid??

- the investment firm's own literature says that it was NOT an actual nor licenses brokerage firm! Doesn't anyone read before writing checks for millions?

- The guy Salinas drove a Bentley and flew private jets....

- the guy appears to be the classic con-artist and scammer -- lots of evidence and paper trails...

- Clearly the guy broke NCAA rules ..note this comment...
"Canvass former players and coaches for Salinas stories, and the phrase you're most likely to hear is, "I don't know if this was legal, but .."
...so obviously everyone knew he was skirting the NCAA rules!

- Further reports prove beyond quesiton the guy was throwing his (actually not his, but the money he stole) money around, constantly breaking NCAA rules (see link below)

http://cnnsi.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?=&urlID=457254472&action=cpt&partnerID=289881

Now many more news outlets are listing more and more names of college coaches who sent this guy a bunch of money.
Why would anyone do that -- think about it -- there are fine investment brokers everywhere. Maybe I could see it if Salinas had a great track record of producing sound investment advice and making money for his clients. BUT -- that undoubtedly was NOT the case at all. In fact -- one has to wonder how anyone can leave his money with a guy who is flittering it all away and not know it?
Wouldn't you expect a statement every month? Wouldn't you demand an accurate accounting of your money -- especially if you are sending the guy HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of dollars as Jankovich did? Who gives this kind of money to anyone without expecting something in return??

One blogger shows that of the last 50 D-I players produced by Salinas -- at least 17 went to schools & coaches who had sent him money and the number could be higher!
That's more then 1/3 of all his D-I caliber players going where the money came from!
Pretty danged suspicious!!
http://twitter.com/#!/Zagacious/status/96317649188962305
http://twitter.com/#!/Zagacious/status/96295797741727745

Jank is in the news in one other way, also....
You remember that many players have been run off by Jank -- kids like Bobby Hill, Kellen Thornton, Terrence Johnson, and most recently Justin Clark. These players didn't just up and leave of their own accord - there's clear evidence they were booted. Bradley's players who leave always leave behind notes, letters, and tweets that prove they DID leave of their own accord and were NOT run off. I don't know of a single BU player who was "run off" - not even TCS who despite his charges and the disagreements he had with coaches - TCS still left of his own choosing and openly admitted that he did.

BUT -- there's an article in a Missouri paper telling about ISU's Justin Clark landing at an unknown D-II school in Missouri... and it confirms Clark was run off ...
LINK

ISU is already practicing for their 4-game Canadian exhibition tour...



Today is one day that I can definitely agree with the main editorial in the PJ Star which condemns the a$$hole who gunned down dozens of innocent people in Norway for his own perverted purposes.
The really sad thing to the story is that the maximum this guy could ever serve in jail is just 21 years -- that's the law in Norway!!!
I sincerely hope that the weak minded and lily-livered people who would ever devise such a soft penal system iwll not have an awakening and realize you have to destroy the vermin that lives among us.

Starting within just the past generation, the laws in this murderer's own nation of Norway have a maximum sentence of just 21 years no matter how horrific the crime.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/8658063/Norway-shootings-Anders-Breivik-cannot-get-more-than-21-years.html

Claims that this guy was a Christian are a little hard to support since now a full week later nobody has yet found ONE single thread of evidence of any Christian organizationb the killer has ever been associated with and it is clear he never went to church and he was never known by even his own family or acquaintences as a Christian or espousing Christian viewpoints. This man was NOT a Christian so any reports as such are phony.

In reality the guy's manifesto borrowed things from "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski's manifesto, from Nazi writings, and from other weirdo sources, it shows he hates basically all religions and trends towards being a Neo-Nazi, BUT -- that he STATES he admires Vladimir Putin, even rambles about the Knights of the Templar as if he has just seen "The Da Vinci Code".....but nothing in the manifesto even remotely looks like or comes from any Christian writings.

Wouldn't you think if he was a Christian someone would recall seeing the killer attend a church at some time?
The killer is also a product of a broken homes, several divorces between his mother & father -- hasn't seen his father much nor had any meaningful relationship with his father since age 1, and was raised in a fairly permissive and liberal society.
Other evidence shows he once owned a natural organic farm, liked "war-themed video games & movies", but was never known by any of his acquaintances to have ever demonstrated Christian beliefs..

But here's the text from the PJ Star editorial I like in describing this Norweigan murderer....a wormy little guy who thinks he is somebody -- an ego as large and the man is puny.
"There can never be any justification for it. (Extremism) Those prone to extremism often latch arbitrarily on to some concept - it could be one thing one day, the polar opposite the next - and obsess about it, working themselves into a frenzy because that's how they're wired.

So why all the handwringing about what the political leanings of a 32-year-old who lived with his mom were?
How can anyone put any stock in the twisted musings of yet another psychopath with a martyr complex and delusions of grandeur, a nobody trying to prove he's somebody, and failing yet again? There is no way to rationalize the irrational, to make sense of the senseless. A murderer is a murderer.

Who kills kids and believes that will win him converts? This guy may or may not be insane, he may or may not have been high on drugs, but he is seriously clueless."
Link



Here's one I like -- one piece of evidence that's been used for decades as the strongest proof of evolution - especially evolution of reptiles into birds...
has been debunked as a bird and is now seen to just be another ugly reptile!!!
So when will the evolutionists ever get their wrguemtn straight without having to undo and correct themselves?
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2011/07/28/3280257.htm?site=science/opinion&topic=ancient